Critical Review Desk
In his book The Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind from the Big Bang to the 21st Century (2001) Howard Bloom presents the theory that life on earth has evolved as a collective global whole. He sees two fundamental processes at work in evolution. One process is integration, generating conformity and unity, and the other process is differentiation, generating diversity and individuality. Although these two processes are oppositional, integration and differentiation also work in tandem, mutually stimulating each other, and producing increasing complexity as a result.
My connection with William Irwin Thompson is tangential. He did a year residency at the University of Hawai’i’s Department of Political Science at the same time I was pursuing my doctoral studies there. Just after he left, I encountered his books, The Time It Takes Falling Bodies to Light, and a year later, Pacific Shift. I enjoyed his exuberant writing style, informed by his anthropological scholarship viewed through a New Age lens.
There is a strong connection between futures studies and fear studies. In science fiction, we have dystopian and apocalyptic narratives. In the formal futures research, the collapse or disaster scenario is not missing from a usual range of alternative futures that are generated. Existential risk centers and their scholars also deal with and use fear on a large scale for policy recommendations.
Weak and strong signals, from diverse and independent sources, point to an imminent global consciousness, suggesting spirit, mind, and ethical revolutions. On the horizon, we observe a new rush hour of the prophets, ideologies, and cults calling for first values and first principles. In 2100 the planetary consciousness will push machine-humanity towards increasing freedom. In 3000, at the dawn of the cosmic age, the myth of the sacred rock will be re-defined around the entire planet Earth.
Almost all reasonable futures studies scholars will agree to condemn the war and aggression and are peace loving people. However, we need to understand the deeper historical causes of war before negotiating perpetual peace. In Washington DC the dominant narrative is that this ongoing horror is only a personal choice by Putin (assuming many Russians have nothing to do with it). The question is whether the Ukraine war is triggered by an individual or is it an outcome of some sort of underlying structural, social or collective consciousness struggle.